The speculations on the origin of
the Industrial Revolution indicate the prosperity of Great Britain arising out
of conditions that occurred simultaneously and necessarily. It appears that
without the seemingly coincidental collision of events that led to the
manifestation of an industrialized Britain, the revolution as history
understands it would have never existed at all. One could speculate that the
increased agricultural production reared from the better developed technology
as well as methodology surrounding the production system in turn created the
increased population that necessarily occurred alongside it, that the
innovative thinking that devised procedures such as crop rotation and selective
breeding fostered the workers to be born off the cheap food now readily
available. Regardless, the combination of the two that occurred in Britain on
account of the selective farming techniques that the country employed to allow
for marketable farms to prosper over the individual farmer paved a smooth
foundation for the birth of the revolution due to a surplus in workers full of
rich, cheap caloric intake and restless angst.
Other preexisting conditions generated
the expanse of industry in Britain that did not exist in neighboring and
equally available countries. The governmental policies contributed
significantly to their growth in direct comparison to France; in Britain,
tolerance emerged before the occurrence of a revolution, which took France
until the late eighteenth to early nineteenth century to gain, allowing the
increase in scientific minds to collaborate in the country. The tariff policies
also favored internal growth rather than external importation of goods such as
textiles from neighboring countries. Therefore, Britain provided its residence
with a greater incentive to engage their intelligent, Scientifically
Revolutionized minds to initiate technological growth. The universities within
Britain fostered experimentation as well as practical development in the fields
of technology much more than technologically advanced countries such as China
or India. This also created a means for the Industrial Revolution to occur on
the grounds of a constant stream of improvement and growth. While Britain
favored the development of mechanical devises, China placed its importance on religious
devotion and understanding. It becomes clear the advantages of Britain against
the rest of the world when the smaller and less identifiable points such as
these are examined. In total, the Industrial Revolution was not an advantage
that could be found on the global level; it was not a comparison between the economic
standings of the countries, the military superiority, the population size, the
greatest ruler. In actuality, it did not have to do with the country as a whole
at all. The Industrial Revolution was born from the individual mind, the
individual cooperation, and the individual desire to better one’s condition.
The Industrial Revolution occurred with a modern mentality, one of capitalism,
expansion, improvement, and constant gain through self-interest. The greatest
thing Britain was able to do for itself was provide the exact means for this
ideal to develop, and therefore won the race for technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment