It is
interesting that communism bared its philosophy through the use of violence and
dramatic revolutions when its foundations reside in the common good among
people. As an adopted government strategy, communism supports relying on the
neighbor, the other, in order to survive in a system derived from a very
simple, basic, rational definition of equality: people are equal and should be
treated as such; there is no difference in class. Consequently, this mentality
led to the spread of equality among genders as well. Women in communist Russia
experienced more rights than could be elsewhere matched. However, in order for
Russia to achieve its claimed communist status, neglecting to substantially
partake in the initial socialist practice as outlined by the founder Karl Marx,
it had to “experience a revolution” (Strayer 660). The necessity for violence
and war to force the current government to assuage the demands of the people
probably arose from the war time mentality of the global state of the world.
Russia’s revolution occurred in 1917, perfectly coinciding with the end of
World War I. The First World War began
due heavily to the increased nationalism that spread throughout the countries.
Therefore, it is natural to think of a country such as Russia, which did not
wage well within the conflicts of the war itself, whose people suffered
terribly on account of the poor status in the war, and whose people also rallied
on the concept of abandoning individual egos in favor of the national, common
imperialistic goal. However their goal was not to divide and conquer, the
mentality fostered the growth the Marx’s communist theory, one of equality among
people and shared responsibility for survival. For Russia to transform into the
Soviet Union now seems almost expected when the factors of the world are
accounted for.
Both
communist China and the Soviet Union suffered immense setbacks in their initial
attempts at the reformations of their respective countries. A common trait of
the people was to suffer deploring famine resulting in a combined loss of
roughly twenty six million people due to the countries removal of individual
farming abilities and utensils. In most cases, when the government attempted to
take an individual’s farm animal, be it a cow, pig, or sheep, the person would
rather slaughter the animal than relinquish their possession of it. Therefore,
certain people remained steadfast to the underlying capitalist ideal of
individual improvement and possession. Naturally, people adhere to this
instinctual desire to support themselves and no one else. Even when the
communist governments had launched into their full throttle, certain aspects of
the government continued to rely on capitalist mentalities. In Russia, during
their rapid industrial growth, urban areas were centers for the driven and the
intellectual. It was a place of working towards improvement with competitive
wages as incentive. In the Soviet Union, “ a highly privileged group of state
and party leaders emerged in the Stalin era and largely remained the
unchallenged ruling class of the country” not unlike the capitalist driven
countries that surrounded the communist Russia (Strayer 672).
No comments:
Post a Comment